Closing arguments in the Manhattan criminal trial of former President Donald Trump: Analysis by Norman Eisen

The Manhattan criminal trial of former President Donald Trump has reached its closing arguments after 20 days of trial, with a focus on 34 felony document falsification charges related to a hush money payment made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. The trial featured testimony from 22 witnesses and over 200 exhibits, leading to a heated debate between defense counsel Todd Blanche and Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass.

The key questions in the case revolve around whether the allegedly false records actually contain false information, whether Trump possessed an intent to defraud, and whether he covered up an election conspiracy. Blanche argued that the prosecution failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the documents were false or that Trump had fraudulent intent, while Steinglass countered with evidence such as handwritten notations and witness testimony to support their case.

The prosecution’s argument focused on the alleged conspiracy to corrupt the 2016 election and cover up the payment to Daniels, citing violations of campaign finance laws and tax laws. Despite the defense’s attempts to discredit witnesses like Michael Cohen, the prosecution maintained a strong case with corroboration and detailed evidence.

Overall, the prosecution appeared to have the upper hand in the closing arguments, with a likely outcome favoring their case. The trial may have left room for a hung jury, but the likelihood of that outcome seems low. The conclusion of this high-profile trial will have significant implications for Trump and his legal troubles.

The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2024 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.